| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Foundation analysis using multi linear spring |
PSRaju
Replies: 1
Views: 2164
|
 Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:45 am Subject: Foundation analysis using multi linear spring |
Dear Ganesh,
Could you please upload the corrected file
thanks & regards
Raju |
| Topic: Proposed REVISION OF IS:456-2000- Inviting Comments |
PSRaju
Replies: 161
Views: 111335
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:20 am Subject: Proposed REVISION OF IS:456-2000- Inviting Comments |
Dear All,
For beams the minimum diameter of bars shall be specified as mentioned for columns.
I observed that some consultants are proposing 8mm dia for beams as top hanger bars at mid span (Span ... |
| Topic: Wind loading standard IS 875 (Part 3) 2015 |
PSRaju
Replies: 2
Views: 2987
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:41 am Subject: Wind loading standard IS 875 (Part 3) 2015 |
Dear Ganesh
Is the new code (2015) released and available in the market
regards
Raju |
| Topic: Design a Large Building WITHOUT expansion Joint |
PSRaju
Replies: 20
Views: 22224
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2015 7:07 am Subject: Re: Design a Large Building WITHOUT expansion Joint |
Dear Umesh rao sir,
I did not understand how 8400 sq.mm steel is required for 4600kN tension.
Is the required area of steel for top is 8400sq.mm and bottom is 8400 sq.mm (Total 16800 sq ... |
| Topic: Difference in Bending Moment Values in STAAD PRO |
PSRaju
Replies: 5
Views: 6589
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:14 am Subject: Difference in Bending Moment Values in STAAD PRO |
Dear Er. Bijay sarkar,
Thank You for your reply elaborating the basics of STAAD.
As you pointed out the maximum Bending Moments displayed in STAAD Post Processing for envelope is not correct. ... |
| Topic: Difference in Bending Moment Values in STAAD PRO |
PSRaju
Replies: 5
Views: 6589
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:44 am Subject: Difference in Bending Moment Values in STAAD PRO |
Dear All,
In Staad Pro it is observed that there is some variation in display of Maximum span bending moment. In Post processing the maximum span BM for Beam 4 is indicated as -7192.7 kNm. When I ... |
| Topic: NEED TUTORIALS FOR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORY BUILDI |
PSRaju
Replies: 34
Views: 32114
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:59 am Subject: Re: Example of design of RCC control room building using Sta |
Dear Er. Rajan,
Could you pl. send a copy to I have one complete example of design of typical calculation of Control room building using Staad Pro analysis. Due to space constraint, I can not ... |
| Topic: Minimum no. of piles under columns |
PSRaju
Replies: 12
Views: 14508
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:12 am Subject: Re: Minimum no. of piles under columns |
| If the design is performed with support condition of column as hinged, during execution at site it is practically difficult to provide hinged base at Pile Cap for RCC columns. As suggested by the exp ... |
| Topic: Gem of Structural Engineering (Prof. P.C.Varghese) |
PSRaju
Replies: 11
Views: 21125
|
Forum: Engineering Marvels Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:21 am Subject: Re: Gem of Structural Engineering (Prof. P.C.Varghese) |
[COLOR=#494429]Er. V. G. Abhyankar, [/COLOR]
[COLOR=#494429][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]स्थापत्य तथा वास् ... |
| Topic: COMBINE FOOTING |
PSRaju
Replies: 7
Views: 10367
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:23 am Subject: Re: combined footing |
Dear Er Makesh Kumar ,
The following method is being adopted by our organisation.
CG is to be worked out for DL+LL case as Wind and Earth quake loads are rare load cases. The extra moment due ... |
| |
Subscriptions
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Donate
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in to website