| Author |
Message |
 Topic: blast load |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 10
Views: 9407
|
 Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 12:00 pm Subject: blast load |
Dear Sir,
My earlier reply (2009) was regarding Non Linear Time History Analysis in STAAD, which was not possible at that time. Currently STAAD has added some features regarding non linear time his ... |
| Topic: IS IT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE BOTH PILE FOUNDATIONS AND ISOLATED FOOTINGS IN A MIXED FASHION FOR A BUILDING? |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 9
Views: 3012
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:40 am Subject: IS IT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE BOTH PILE FOUNDATIONS AND ISOLATED FOOTINGS IN A MIXED FASHION FOR A BUILDING? |
Dear Renju,
Considering two stories and 25 columns, I presume that you will be having lighter loads for peripheral columns. Hence isolating building to account for differential settlement may not b ... |
| Topic: Seismic / Earthquake Load Combinations for structures/Buildings |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 15
Views: 6008
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:27 am Subject: Seismic / Earthquake Load Combinations for structures/Buildings |
Your first question is already answered by Arunkumar. Provision for reduction of LL factor in load combination is not suggested by revised code IS1893 Part 1 2016.
Second Question: Whenever you are ... |
| Topic: Design of Footing for EQ resistant structures |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 18
Views: 12065
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:55 am Subject: Design of Footing for EQ resistant structures |
Dear Hemal,
I agree with the fact that SSI will not affect the response of buildings founded on rock or rock like material.
But, as there is scope for difference in opinion in codal provisions ... |
| Topic: Design of Footing for EQ resistant structures |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 18
Views: 12065
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:45 am Subject: Design of Footing for EQ resistant structures |
Dear Er Vijayarathnam,
Cl 6.1.4, IS1893 Part 1 : 2016
Soil structure interaction may not be considered in seismic analysis of structures supported on rock or rock like material at shallow depth.
... |
| Topic: Stiffness modifiers in IS 1893-2016-1 and draft tall building code. |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 5
Views: 7067
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:34 am Subject: Stiffness modifiers in IS 1893-2016-1 and draft tall building code. |
Dear Sir,
I think IS1893 Part 1 has missed the provisions of separate stiffness modifiers for SLS.
If we compare these provisions with ACI318-11 (ACI318-14 is having major changes about the pro ... |
| Topic: STAAD.Pro steel modelling |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 4
Views: 4029
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 4:01 am Subject: STAAD.Pro steel modelling |
Dear Sasindran,
Following 2 points to be considered carefully while modeling steel elements in STAAD
1. Orientation of members shall be correct: This use to be problem generally for angle member ... |
| Topic: Design of Footing for EQ resistant structures |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 18
Views: 12065
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:50 am Subject: Design of Footing for EQ resistant structures |
Dear Er Vijayarathnam,
I prefer following philosophy for the considering foundation stiffness.
1. Analysis 1: Assign fixed support irrespective of tie / Grade beams.
2. Work out foundation ... |
| Topic: explanatory on IS 1893- Part 4(Industrial Structurs) |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 3
Views: 4465
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:25 pm Subject: explanatory on IS 1893- Part 4(Industrial Structurs) |
Amol,
We need to interpolate for the intermediate values of damping.
BIS has issued IS1893 Part 1 : 2016 recently and suggested to consider 5% damped response spectrum irrespective of MOC. I pre ... |
| Topic: Clause in IS:1893 draft |
Yogesh.Pisal
Replies: 23
Views: 20074
|
Forum: SEFI General Discussion Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:16 am Subject: Clause in IS:1893 draft |
Dear All,
Refer the Cl c-3, page no 44 in the following book.
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/IITK-GSDMA/EBB_001_30May2013.pdf
This will focus on the requirement of 15% separation of time period ... |
| |
Subscriptions
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Donate
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in to website