www.sefindia.org

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

 Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptions DigestDigest Preferences   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister FAQSecurity Tips FAQDonate
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum 
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

Search found 170 matches
www.sefindia.org Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: Clarification on computation of modification factor for tension reinforcement in IS 456: 2000
aditya

Replies: 4
Views: 1111

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 5:59 am   Subject: Clarification on computation of modification factor for tension reinforcement in IS 456: 2000
Dear Respected N. Subramanian Sir,
Actually, my query was related to the interpretation of p in the SP 24 formula for modification factor for tension reinforcement. If we take pt=pt , the result woul ...
  Topic: Clarification on computation of modification factor for tension reinforcement in IS 456: 2000
aditya

Replies: 4
Views: 1111

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2020 6:03 am   Subject: Clarification on computation of modification factor for tension reinforcement in IS 456: 2000
Dear Respected N. Subramanian Sir,
This refers to the provision of Span/Effective Depthrequirement for simplified check for deflection in RC beams & slabs as perclause 23.2.1 (c) of IS 456: 2000. ...
  Topic: Modifications of Elastic Drift for Inter-storey Drift Check in IS 1893 Part 1: 2016
aditya

Replies: 1
Views: 597

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:21 am   Subject: Modifications of Elastic Drift for Inter-storey Drift Check in IS 1893 Part 1: 2016
Dear Sefians,
The Indian seismic design code IS 1893 Part 1: 2016 stipulates in Clause 7.11.1.1 that storey drift in any storey shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height under the design base sh ...
  Topic: Design for Vertical Earthquake Effects as per IS 1893 Part1: 2016
aditya

Replies: 5
Views: 3097

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:32 pm   Subject: Design for Vertical Earthquake Effects as per IS 1893 Part1: 2016
Dear Akshaya Mallan Sir,
Thanks a lot for responding to my query. The solution suggested by you will work for design in the case of Equivalent Static Method. The problem I am facing is how to distrib ...
  Topic: Design for Vertical Earthquake Effects as per IS 1893 Part1: 2016
aditya

Replies: 5
Views: 3097

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 1:33 pm   Subject: Design for Vertical Earthquake Effects as per IS 1893 Part1: 2016
Dear Sefians,
Can somebody guide me on how to apply vertical seismic forces in different storeys as per IS 1893 Part 1: 2016? Will its distribution similar to horizontal seismic forces in different s ...
  Topic: Reason behind defining maximum strain in limit state design of RC structures instead of maximum stress
aditya

Replies: 4
Views: 1311

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 1:45 pm   Subject: Reason behind defining maximum strain in limit state design of RC structures instead of maximum stress
Dear Respected N S Subramanian Sir,
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for responding to my query. My observation is: In Working Stress Method (WSM) of design, we have been using the concep ...
  Topic: Reason behind defining maximum strain in limit state design of RC structures instead of maximum stress
aditya

Replies: 4
Views: 1311

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:35 pm   Subject: Reason behind defining maximum strain in limit state design of RC structures instead of maximum stress
Dear Sefians,
May I post a basic or elementary question in this forum:
Why is it that maximum strain is specified instead of maximum stress as a failure or limit state criteria in the design of RC s ...
  Topic: Clarification on calculation of stability index of RC Frame
aditya

Replies: 11
Views: 7272

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:52 pm   Subject: Clarification on calculation of stability index of RC Frame
Dear Sefians,
I am curious to know how some of the commercial software calculates the stability index Q to determine whether a particular storey in a frame structure is sway or non-sway. For example, ...
  Topic: Download blocked for e-subscription of ICJ
aditya

Replies: 0
Views: 638

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:46 am   Subject: Download blocked for e-subscription of ICJ
Dear Sefians,
It is quite surprising to find that the subscriber who enrolled for e-journal option of Indian Concrete Journals can only view the pages online but cannot download them. Earlier, subscr ...
  Topic: Status of Revision of IS 1893 Part 1 and IS 13920 by IITGN
aditya

Replies: 3
Views: 1827

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 5:31 pm   Subject: Status of Revision of IS 1893 Part 1 and IS 13920 by IITGN
[HIGHLIGHT=#ffffff][COLOR=#444444][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Dear Respected Sirs,[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#444444][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]I beg your pardon for the ...
 
Page 1 of 17 Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
All times are GMT
Jump to:  


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA, Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. advertisement policy