STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

Max. displ is expected to be at the point where the column support is removed, i suppose. But i wonder why you want to remove columns of 4th and roof.

Anyway, you need to insert non-linear hinges i ...

you don't model cracks... you only set parameters for smeared cracks.

Sir,
Try with Notion Press publishers:

https://notionpress.com/

Rahul Leslie

1. Reduced MI will not be used for calculating fundamental natural frequencies of the structure. Seismic loads are calculated using the above structure frequencies only

Is that so? I can't find tha ...

I wounder how the 0.3*Q was arrived at in the seismic case. I presume the 0.3, was probably the live load reduction, as with IS:1893-2000 (where the reduction was allowed for design load cases too).
...

Dear SEFI’ans,

I can understand point 3 above, and that it is meant, but can't find where it is explicitly said in IS:1893-2016. Someone please point it out for me. Also I wonder whether it is arch ...

I think I'll re-state my doubt:

As with the earlier code, a 'base shear correction' has to be done when doing a Response Spectrum analysis (7.7.3).

In the process, the Vb-dash is, as in earlier ...

In IS:1893, in the Response Spectrum analysis, for 'base shear correction' as per 7.7.3, does the Vb-bar "calculated using fundamental period Ta, where Ta is as per 7.6.2" need to be correct ...

I think it’s fairly clear:
1.5 DL + 1.5 ELX becomes 1.5 DL + 1.5*(100/80) ELX which is 1.5 DL + 1.875 ELX
1.2 (DL + LL + ELX) becomes 1.2 (DL + LL) + 1.2*(100/80) ELX, which is 1.2 (DL + LL) + 1.5 E ...

I have seen a structural magazine of the 70’s that had a advertisement for a computer that looked like this: And it said about being accompanied by programs readymade for structural design engineers. ...