www.sefindia.org

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

 Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptions DigestDigest Preferences   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister FAQSecurity Tips FAQDonate
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum 
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

Search found 783 matches
www.sefindia.org Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: Amendments to IS 456:2000
suresh_sharma

Replies: 7
Views: 6046

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:37 am   Subject: Amendments to IS 456:2000
Dear Mr. Srinivasan,
As per the revision talked about in this thread, any type of rft be it shrinkage, temp, distribution, the spacing should not be more than 300 mm. What you are talking about is th ...
  Topic: Unsupported length of column
suresh_sharma

Replies: 68
Views: 36040

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:28 am   Subject: Unsupported length of column
In the surface element there is nothing like major axis or minor axis. Major or minor is possible only for the sections where there is possibility of two or more moment of inertia one being the maximu ...
  Topic: why 0.8% as minimum reinf. for column ?
suresh_sharma

Replies: 29
Views: 30887

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:47 am   Subject: why 0.8% as minimum reinf. for column ?
To,
Rashid zia,
In your case the effective length of compression member I.e. Column does not increase three times lateral dimension. Refer clause 25.1.1 of code. Hence pedestal. Requirement of rft w ...
  Topic: Amendments to IS 456:2000
suresh_sharma

Replies: 7
Views: 6046

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:02 am   Subject: Amendments to IS 456:2000
It means that no reinforcement be it temp, shrinkage or distribution shall not be spaced at less than 300mm. Whether ACI code has already implemented the above provision in their codes.
  Topic: Staad Output issue
suresh_sharma

Replies: 7
Views: 5986

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:57 am   Subject: Staad Output issue
This is a case in which the footing would be resting on a relatively weaker strata, definitely would not be providing a rigid support to the footing. Hence it would be more appropriate to treat the su ...
  Topic: Is xpansion Joint required in Precast Compound Wall of 50 km
suresh_sharma

Replies: 5
Views: 4722

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:01 am   Subject: Is xpansion Joint required in Precast Compound Wall of 50 km
It is true that expansion joint better to call it construction joint is provided generally @ 8m or even lower in case of compound wall but the consideration in my view is not temperature. The consider ...
  Topic: PROPED CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL DESIGN
suresh_sharma

Replies: 7
Views: 5421

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:06 pm   Subject: PROPED CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL DESIGN
Sri Prabhakar has made very good excel sheets for design of many RCC structures. You may send personal message to him.
  Topic: Regarding effective length of column in staad.pro
suresh_sharma

Replies: 8
Views: 8530

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 2:48 pm   Subject: Regarding effective length of column in staad.pro
Sri Prabhakar,

There is disagreement between the sway columns defined in Annexure E of IS 456 and unbraced (sway) defined section 39.7.1 clause 3 of IS 456 in the matter of unbraced columns. Annexu ...
  Topic: Effects in reaction by rotation of footing
suresh_sharma

Replies: 5
Views: 4152

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 3:01 pm   Subject: Effects in reaction by rotation of footing
In design of footings the effect of Fx and Fz (both being horizontal) are negligible. They are used for checking against friction. If Mx and Mz are the outcome of one and the same load case, the desig ...
  Topic: SBC in seismic load case
suresh_sharma

Replies: 8
Views: 4304

PostForum: SEFI General Discussion   Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 4:09 am   Subject: SBC in seismic load case
Dear members,

Can any body enlighten me as to which clause of the Indian code stipulates
for increasing sbc in case of wind load. Please mind it not the seismic load.
 
Page 1 of 79 Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 77, 78, 79  Next
All times are GMT
Jump to:  


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA, Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. advertisement policy