| |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hemalmistry
...
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 70
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:59 pm Post subject: clause 8.1.3.3.1 and clause 9.6 |
 |
|
| Clause 8.1.3.3.1 permits to exclude backstay effect for tall buildings with seismic joint between tower and podium. However, clause 9.6 requires to avoid expansion joint in basement of tall building. Does it meen that seismic joint can be provided but expansion joint can not be provided? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pushpinder84
Progressive Member
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 46
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Clause 9.6 refers to the expansion joints within the building as opposed to the separation joint between the building and the podium. Closing of this joint will result in analysis similar to 8.1.3.3.3 (towers connected by podium) and not 8.1.3.3.1.
Regards
Pushpinder Chauhan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Donate
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in to website
