Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses. Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:59 pm Post subject: clause 220.127.116.11.1 and clause 9.6
Clause 18.104.22.168.1 permits to exclude backstay effect for tall buildings with seismic joint between tower and podium. However, clause 9.6 requires to avoid expansion joint in basement of tall building. Does it meen that seismic joint can be provided but expansion joint can not be provided?
Clause 9.6 refers to the expansion joints within the building as opposed to the separation joint between the building and the podium. Closing of this joint will result in analysis similar to 22.214.171.124.3 (towers connected by podium) and not 126.96.36.199.1.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum