|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Elakkiyarajan SEFI Member
Joined: 12 Nov 2011 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:22 pm Post subject: Etabs design |
|
|
Respected Sefians
In etabs column design, after analysing and concrete design it shows some longitudinal reinforcement value. If I change frame type from "ductile"to"ordinary". Longitudinal reinforcement values may change drastically. Is it right procedure to change like that. Please sefians through some light on it.
And I use etabs 16 and etabs 17. Both shows different reinforcement values for same model. Which version is preferable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rifat Bin Ahmed SEFI Member
Joined: 20 Jul 2019 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 8:55 am Post subject: Re: Etabs design |
|
|
Elakkiyarajan wrote: | If I change frame type from "ductile"to"ordinary". Longitudinal reinforcement values may change drastically. |
How can you change frame type in ETBAS 16?As far I know there are no procedure to change ductile to ordinary frame.Do you change Sway special to ordinary frame in etabs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sakumar79 ...
Joined: 18 Apr 2008 Posts: 713
|
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Er Elakkiaraj,
ETABS uses IS13920 to design members when Ductile design parameter is used (under View/Revise overwrites). This is the default for any member created in a model even after all existing members have changed the parameter. If you are designing the structure to IS13920, you should use Ductile parameter, else you should change it to Ordinary.
If you are getting different values of steel in 2016 and 2017 versions, please check the member end forces. If these itself are different, there is a change in analysis results. If these are same, design alone is different. You can try to compare with hand calculations to see where the difference is.
You can also go through the changelog to see if there was revision in the analysis or design aspects. This will help identify if the change was deliberate or accidental.
For further guidance, you should contact the ETABS customer support.
Hope this helps
S Arunkumar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maulik Hothi SEFI Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2018 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:08 am Post subject: Re: Etabs design |
|
|
Elakkiyarajan wrote: | Respected Sefians
In etabs column design, after analysing and concrete design it shows some longitudinal reinforcement value. If I change frame type from "ductile"to"ordinary". Longitudinal reinforcement values may change drastically. Is it right procedure to change like that. Please sefians through some light on it.
And I use etabs 16 and etabs 17. Both shows different reinforcement values for same model. Which version is preferable. |
Dear Er Elakkiaraj,
If you Change the Column design, after analysis and concrete design "ductile"to"ordinary" etabs skip the ductile detailing code.
Etabs 2016 is not updated with IS code 13920 2016 and Etabs 17 is updated with IS Code 13920 2016
IS code 13920 2016 introduce Relative strength of beam and column at a joint clause no. 7.2 P.N. 8
In ductile case Etabs Model use IS 13920 2016 clause no. 7.2 for ductile details and In ordinary case Etabs model skip the IS 13920 2016 code.
I hope you get the answer
Maulik Hothi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elakkiyarajan SEFI Member
Joined: 12 Nov 2011 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear sefians
Thanks all for clearing my doubts regarding in etabs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|