View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ronnie_singh SEFI Member
Joined: 24 Oct 2019 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 3:08 pm Post subject: Equivalent floor load calculation |
|
|
why the result of equivalent floor load (from triangular and trapezoidal load) on beam from slab formula is different from manual calculation or staad floor load. PFA an excel file to verify the possible mistake if any
P.S Plz share your views or comment after or before downloading the file
Description: |
formula for triangular and trapezoidal load on beam from slab |
|
Filesize: |
14.15 KB |
Viewed: |
521 Time(s) |
|
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses. Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
Description: |
Equivalent floor load calculation |
|
Download |
Filename: |
LOAD CALCULATION.xlsx |
Filesize: |
236.16 KB |
Downloaded: |
965 Time(s) |
Last edited by ronnie_singh on Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
syed_A ...
Joined: 22 Oct 2011 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear ronnie singh
In cell E14 and E15 you are using standard formula based on yield line to distribute triangular and trapezoidal load on beam, where as in cell S17 and S18 you simply calculating area of triangle and trapezium dividing by its base to get the load on the beam which i think wont match. Hope i understand correctly your doubt
regards
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RJSugantha SEFI Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2018 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:30 am Post subject: Equivalent floor load calculation |
|
|
the triangular and trapezoidal load should not be directly divided by the length of the beam.It has to be converted into equivalent udl load. Equivalent udl is obtained by equating the max moment due to the triangular/trapezoidal load with max moment due to the equivalent udl.
Posted via Email
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tosifsayyed Progressive Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2013 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can you share the staad file?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronnie_singh SEFI Member
Joined: 24 Oct 2019 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
syed_A wrote: | Dear ronnie singh
In cell E14 and E15 you are using standard formula based on yield line to distribute triangular and trapezoidal load on beam, where as in cell S17 and S18 you simply calculating area of triangle and trapezium dividing by its base to get the load on the beam which i think wont match. Hope i understand correctly your doubt
regards |
dear sefian, yes i have used yield line theory formula in cell E14 and E15. again i have used the area to calculate total load on respective beam i.e in cell Q17 and Q18, dividing with the base to get the respective load in udl in cell S17 and S18 from my understanding. How to convert/calculate the load intensity calculated by Staad into udl as per yield line theory or vice versa.
are the cells E14 and E15 value are equivalent udl?. If so then why the result is not same as calculated by Staad when cell E8 value is applied as floor load
In all there approach:-
1. using cell E14 and E15 value in Staad as udl
2. using cell E8 value in floor load
3. using cell E14 and E15 value in Staad as triangular(uvl) and trapezoidal(uvl+udl) the results are incomprehensible.
PFA of Staad files in zip. N.B Files are of Staad connect edition Version 21
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses. Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
Description: |
N.B Files are of Staad connect edition Version 21 |
|
Download |
Filename: |
Stadd file.zip |
Filesize: |
1.73 KB |
Downloaded: |
529 Time(s) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tosifsayyed Progressive Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2013 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
In Staad, when you use floor load, load on beam is calculated as Wlx/3 for both triangular and trapezoidal area and for one way load it is Wlx/2.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronnie_singh SEFI Member
Joined: 24 Oct 2019 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 10:04 am Post subject: how |
|
|
tosifsayyed wrote: | In Staad, when you use floor load, load on beam is calculated as Wlx/3 for both triangular and trapezoidal area and for one way load it is Wlx/2. |
How? can u show me. i have enclosed the excel and staad file but results are not same. i have input the vaule of Wlx/3 but not same as yield line formula.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tosifsayyed Progressive Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2013 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, that's my mistake, staad is taking WLx/2 for both one way and two way slab (triangular and trapezoidal). But it should be taken as WLx/3 for triangular and trapezoidal part of two way slab and WLx/2 for one way slab, if you want to apply it on each and every individual beam.
This is what the discussion I had with one of my senior.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronnie_singh SEFI Member
Joined: 24 Oct 2019 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tosifsayyed wrote: | Sorry, that's my mistake, staad is taking WLx/2 for both one way and two way slab (triangular and trapezoidal). But it should be taken as WLx/3 for triangular and trapezoidal part of two way slab and WLx/2 for one way slab, if you want to apply it on each and every individual beam.
This is what the discussion I had with one of my senior. |
So what is your senior's views on it. See formula is correct, staad is also correct, both can be derived but can't be converged. Will be glad if anyone can explain
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronnie_singh SEFI Member
Joined: 24 Oct 2019 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 2:14 pm Post subject: Re: Equivalent floor load calculation |
|
|
RJSugantha wrote: | the triangular and trapezoidal load should not be directly divided by the length of the beam.It has to be converted into equivalent udl load. Equivalent udl is obtained by equating the max moment due to the triangular/trapezoidal load with max moment due to the equivalent udl.
Posted via Email |
Dear Sefian, it seems like i have missed your comment but finally i have noticed. Will you please elaborate with the same example i have enclosed in excel format. i will try from my end but will be more clear if you show me.
Thanks & Regards
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|