| |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nikhil.patelwsm
General Sponsor
Joined: 21 Jul 2013
Posts: 32
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2024 4:35 am Post subject: INCLINED COLUMN DESIGN |
 |
|
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH G+5 FLOOR G AS STILIT PARKING ARCHITECT WANT COENER COLUMN TO BE SHFTED INSIDE BUILDING BY 1.2 M AND MAKE THEM INCLIEND AT 2.1M ABOVE PLINTH FOR CAR MOVEMENT , I HAVE ATTACH ARCH DWG AND SECTION IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE COLUMN INCLINED AT 2.1M I.E. (AT LINTEL LVL TO INCINED TILL FIRST FLOOR AND AFTER THAT FLOOR STAIGHT ) PLEASE GIVE US LOAD PATH IS IT POSSIBLE OR NOT
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
| Description: |
| ELEVATION SUGGESTED BY ME FOR POSSIBILITY WANT TO KNOW CAN THIS BE FISSIBLE |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
SECTION OF COLUMN.pdf |
| Filesize: |
148.75 KB |
| Downloaded: |
94 Time(s) |
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
| Description: |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
SECTION OF COLUMN R1.pdf |
| Filesize: |
148.72 KB |
| Downloaded: |
84 Time(s) |
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
| Description: |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN.pdf |
| Filesize: |
1.13 MB |
| Downloaded: |
94 Time(s) |
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
| Description: |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
GROUND FLOOR PLAN.pdf |
| Filesize: |
1.12 MB |
| Downloaded: |
82 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikram.jeet
General Sponsor
Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 3903
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Inclined column in this building arrangement shall be avoided as it may not provide a healthy structural system.
If Architect is very rigid,, he may be convinced,
Still Rigid :-
Eccentricity of system is never lost and upper storeys load on this column will be eccentric.
A) As regards vertical loads - these will be transferred to this column by twin actions :-
1) Through beam acting as cantilever beam
2) As Inclined member / corbel resisting vertical load tat tip through Thrust force ( much higher than vertical load based on taper angle) ,, PLUS Tensile force in the beam.
It will be wise that for such structural arrangement,, designer shall design 100% for each action.
B) Horizontal forces due to EQ
Transfer beam shall be heavy, to be designed for Moments,, Torsions,, But a x beam at tip of taper must exist tieing various columns and taking care of distribution of Eq forces
STILL I FEEL, NOT A GOOD STRUCTURAL ARRANGEMENT,, NEEDS TO BE AVOIDED IF POSSIBLE ,, SO THAT COLUMNS STRAIGHT( TRULY VERTICAL) WITH Cantilever Overhang OUTSIDE.
.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikram.jeet
General Sponsor
Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 3903
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
FOR BETTER RESISTANCE TO EQ FORCES :-
Please keep Alternate columns truly vertical with Overhang outside,, so that EQ force is fully taken care by truly vertical column s..
I think Architect msy agree.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Donate
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in to website
