www.sefindia.org

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

 Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptions DigestDigest Preferences   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister FAQSecurity Tips FAQDonate
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum 
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

Earthquake of March 28, 2025
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topicReply to topic Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> SEFI General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sangramiitk
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2025 7:30 am    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Thanks.EQ inherent forces supposed to create max moment at column beam connections.
Also shear failure should have happened at some height equivalent to width below that junction.


Such failures are difficult to be explained.


On Sat, 5 Apr, 2025, 8:15 am admin, <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

[quote]            Dear Er Sangram Kesari Das

We have created a short video compiling clips available on internet.

Facebook Video :

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2173899609734069

Youtube Video

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_59VWzFLWhE?feature=share

The slow motion video shows abrupt snapping of two columns as if it lacked ductility in reinforcement , acting as trigger for progressive collapse within seconds.

Lets discuss this in detail.

Best regards

Sanjeev Kumar

Admin SEFI

[quote="sangramiitk"]Sir,Can we have the link of the video of shearing of these stilt floor columns and pre vibration of buildings..


Best Regards
-Sangram Kesari Das




On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:01â€AM venkatarangarao wrote:

      --auto removed--

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anandads
SEFI Regulars
SEFI Regulars


Joined: 20 Oct 2015
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2025 2:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Probably the column for the first oscillation itself underwent the second order effect P-∆ & failed somewhere in the middle. It is a common type of failure of columns in soft stories.
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 2:13 pm sangramiitk, <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Thanks.EQ inherent forces supposed to create max moment at column beam connections.
Also shear failure should have happened at some height equivalent to width below that junction.


Such failures are difficult to be explained.


On Sat, 5 Apr, 2025, 8:15â€am admin, forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

Quote:
           Dear Er Sangram Kesari Das

We have created a short video compiling clips available on internet.

Facebook Video :

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2173899609734069

Youtube Video

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_59VWzFLWhE?feature=share

The slow motion video shows abrupt snapping of two columns as if it lacked ductility in reinforcement , acting as trigger for progressive collapse within seconds.

Lets discuss this in detail.

Best regards

Sanjeev Kumar

Admin SEFI

[quote="sangramiitk"]Sir,Can we have the link of the video of shearing of these stilt floor columns and pre vibration of buildings..


Best Regards
-Sangram Kesari Das




On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:01Ãâ‚AM venkatarangarao  wrote:

      --auto removed--
     



     




Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sanjay Jain
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 14 May 2020
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2025 5:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Thanks to technocrats,
Nicely explain the earth quake happening

1. The lower part of the building, which is the elevated portion from the basement up to a certain height, plays a critical structural role.

2. The entire building behaves like a vertical cantilever under lateral loads such as wind or earthquake forces.

3. Maximum movements and stresses occur at the base or in the lower portion of the building.

4. This part of the building should be designed considering earthquake resistance and the oscillation behavior of the structure. Depends on Select of material, section required and its composite properly .

5. It is essential that this portion is ductile to effectively resist seismic forces from all directions.
Sanjay Jain,
Structural designer
Vardhman Arch-tect private limited Bhopal-11 M P  
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 10:09 pm anandads, <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

[quote]            Probably the column for the first oscillation itself underwent the second order effect P-∆ & failed somewhere in the middle. It is a common type of failure of columns in soft stories.
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 2:13â€pm sangramiitk, forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

      --auto removed--

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anitech
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 06 May 2012
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 3:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Technical Brief; Preliminary Analysis of the Audit Office Building Collapse in Bangkok

Date: April 2025
Event: Collapse of 32-story Audit Office Building, Bangkok
Trigger: 7.7-magnitude Earthquake in Myanmar (March 28, 2025)
Status: Under Investigation 1. Background
On March 28, 2025, the 32-story Audit Office Building in Bangkok suffered a catastrophic collapse following seismic tremors from a magnitude 7.7 earthquake in Myanmar. Although the epicenter was over 500 km away, the seismic activity significantly affected Bangkok, exposing critical structural vulnerabilities. Initial observations and expert commentary provide insights into likely causes while a forensic investigation is ongoing. 2. Suspected Initiation Point
- Lower Column Failure: Failure likely began in longer columns on the lower floors, which are structurally more susceptible to buckling or shear under lateral load.
- Sudden Shear Failure: Eyewitness reports and video footage show rapid column shearing, suggesting brittle failure in vertical load-bearing members. 3. Likely Failure Mechanism
- Progressive Collapse: A cascading failure likely occurred after initial failure of critical components.
- Brittle Failure Mode: The sudden collapse without deformation indicates a brittle failure, potentially due to poor material quality or lack of seismic detailing. 4. Material and Design Concerns
a. Steel Quality Concerns
- Steel samples failed quality tests on mass, chemical composition, and tensile strength.
- Manufactured by a company with a record of safety violations.
- Substandard steel likely reduced the strength and ductility of concrete columns.
b. Structural System Vulnerabilities
- Flat Slab System: Lacks beams and is known to perform poorly in seismic zones.
- Construction Quality: Delays, worker shortages, and cost-cutting may have impacted structural integrity. 5. Role of Mechanical Couplers
- Couplers have not been confirmed as a contributing factor.
- Their role remains under review as part of the ongoing investigation. 6. Collapse of the Core Structure
- The core provided vertical and lateral support but relied on the surrounding structure.
- Once the lower columns failed, global stability was lost, leading to core collapse. 7. Summary of Key Findings (Preliminary)    
Aspect  
Findings    
Failure Initiation  
Likely in lower-floor columns due to longer span and weak material    
Failure Type  
Progressive and brittle collapse    
Primary Suspect  
Substandard steel—deficient in strength and composition    
Design Concern  
Flat slab system—vulnerable under seismic loading    
Construction Issues  
Alleged cost-cutting, worker shortage, and poor oversight    
Core Collapse  
Result of loss in global structural stability    
Coupler Role  
Not confirmed; under investigation    
8. Recommendations for Further Review
- Conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis of material samples and structural debris.
- Implement a regulatory audit of steel supply chains and construction standard enforcement.
- Review seismic design of flat slab buildings in Bangkok and similar risk zones.
- Improve quality control, training, and site supervision for high-rise construction.9. Policy Recommendation:
Maintaining the highest quality standards is imperative at every stage of planning and executing large-scale structural or infrastructure projects. Achieving this requires the involvement of highly qualified experts and professionals throughout the design, construction, and supervision processes.
While post-incident investigations by leading experts are invaluable for diagnosing the causes of structural failures, they should not be the sole line of defense. Proactive policy reforms and administrative oversight must be institutionalized to strengthen quality assurance systems. We must insist and initiate wherever we find it absent.
Such measures are essential to prevent future failures and to ensure structural integrity and public safety from inception to completion.

Learning and learning appropriately from every event is very important for us, the active working professionals.
by:
Mahendra Barde, Mumbai-India .



Chartered Engineer & Consultant


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mahendra-barde/2/b86/9b1
Email: mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com), Cell: 91 98205 05145



Pl don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save Trees. Go Green.
Confidentiality Warning:This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Virus Warning:Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
Disclaimer:We are not a United States Securities Dealer, NFA/CFTC Member, or United States Investment Advisor.All articles and related documents are never considered to be asolicitationfor any purpose, in any form or content.Upon reading the articles and information you hereby acknowledge thiswarning and Disclaimer.All information provided is for informational purposes only, and shallnotbe relied upon as personal financial advice.
Thank you for your cooperation.









On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:03 AM venkatarangarao <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

[quote]            Very well explained, Alpaji Thanks Rangarao V V
Ph.D (Strl Engg, IITH)
SL STRUCTURAL CONSORTIUM
040 66669766


      --auto removed--

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kotnoo
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 9:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Votre soutien continu est une source d'inspiration, merci F1v2tat9yNprYE5p3v.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:43 PM Sanjay Jain <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Thanks to technocrats,
Nicely explain the earth quake happening

1. The lower part of the building, which is the elevated portion from the basement up to a certain height, plays a critical structural role.

2. The entire building behaves like a vertical cantilever under lateral loads such as wind or earthquake forces.

3. Maximum movements and stresses occur at the base or in the lower portion of the building.

4. This part of the building should be designed considering earthquake resistance and the oscillation behavior of the structure. Depends on Select of material, section required and its composite properly .

5. It is essential that this portion is ductile to effectively resist seismic forces from all directions.
Sanjay Jain,
Structural designer
Vardhman Arch-tect private limited Bhopal-11 M P
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 10:09 pm anandads, forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

Quote:
           Probably the column for the first oscillation itself underwent the second order effect P-Ȇ& failed somewhere in the middle. It is a common type of failure of columns in soft stories.
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 2:13Ãâ‚pm sangramiitk, forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org) (forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)))> wrote:

      --auto removed--
     



     





Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
srinivasan_vasudevan
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 12:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

On Wed, 9 Apr, 2025, 14:22 anitech, <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Technical Brief; Preliminary Analysis of the Audit Office Building Collapse in Bangkok

Date: April 2025
Event: Collapse of 32-story Audit Office Building, Bangkok
Trigger: 7.7-magnitude Earthquake in Myanmar (March 28, 2025)
Status: Under Investigation 1. Background
On March 28, 2025, the 32-story Audit Office Building in Bangkok suffered a catastrophic collapse following seismic tremors from a magnitude 7.7 earthquake in Myanmar. Although the epicenter was over 500 km away, the seismic activity significantly affected Bangkok, exposing critical structural vulnerabilities. Initial observations and expert commentary provide insights into likely causes while a forensic investigation is ongoing. 2. Suspected Initiation Point
- Lower Column Failure: Failure likely began in longer columns on the lower floors, which are structurally more susceptible to buckling or shear under lateral load.
- Sudden Shear Failure: Eyewitness reports and video footage show rapid column shearing, suggesting brittle failure in vertical load-bearing members. 3. Likely Failure Mechanism
- Progressive Collapse: A cascading failure likely occurred after initial failure of critical components.
- Brittle Failure Mode: The sudden collapse without deformation indicates a brittle failure, potentially due to poor material quality or lack of seismic detailing. 4. Material and Design Concerns
a. Steel Quality Concerns
- Steel samples failed quality tests on mass, chemical composition, and tensile strength.
- Manufactured by a company with a record of safety violations.
- Substandard steel likely reduced the strength and ductility of concrete columns.
b. Structural System Vulnerabilities
- Flat Slab System: Lacks beams and is known to perform poorly in seismic zones.
- Construction Quality: Delays, worker shortages, and cost-cutting may have impacted structural integrity. 5. Role of Mechanical Couplers
- Couplers have not been confirmed as a contributing factor.
- Their role remains under review as part of the ongoing investigation. 6. Collapse of the Core Structure
- The core provided vertical and lateral support but relied on the surrounding structure.
- Once the lower columns failed, global stability was lost, leading to core collapse. 7. Summary of Key Findings (Preliminary)
Aspect
Findings
Failure Initiation
Likely in lower-floor columns due to longer span and weak material
Failure Type
Progressive and brittle collapse
Primary Suspect
Substandard steel—deficient in strength and composition
Design Concern
Flat slab system—vulnerable under seismic loading
Construction Issues
Alleged cost-cutting, worker shortage, and poor oversight
Core Collapse
Result of loss in global structural stability
Coupler Role
Not confirmed; under investigation
8. Recommendations for Further Review
- Conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis of material samples and structural debris.
- Implement a regulatory audit of steel supply chains and construction standard enforcement.
- Review seismic design of flat slab buildings in Bangkok and similar risk zones.
- Improve quality control, training, and site supervision for high-rise construction.9. Policy Recommendation:
Maintaining the highest quality standards is imperative at every stage of planning and executing large-scale structural or infrastructure projects. Achieving this requires the involvement of highly qualified experts and professionals throughout the design, construction, and supervision processes.
While post-incident investigations by leading experts are invaluable for diagnosing the causes of structural failures, they should not be the sole line of defense. Proactive policy reforms and administrative oversight must be institutionalized to strengthen quality assurance systems. We must insist and initiate wherever we find it absent.
Such measures are essential to prevent future failures and to ensure structural integrity and public safety from inception to completion.

Learning and learning appropriately from every event is very important for us, the active working professionals.
by:
Mahendra Barde, Mumbai-India .



Chartered Engineer & Consultant


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mahendra-barde/2/b86/9b1
Email: mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com) (mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com)), Cell: 91 98205 05145



Pl don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save Trees. Go Green.
Confidentiality Warning:This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Virus Warning:Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
Disclaimer:We are not a United States Securities Dealer, NFA/CFTC Member, or United States Investment Advisor.All articles and related documents are never considered to be asolicitationfor any purpose, in any form or content.Upon reading the articles and information you hereby acknowledge thiswarning and Disclaimer.All information provided is for informational purposes only, and shallnotbe relied upon as personal financial advice.
Thank you for your cooperation.









On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:03â€AM venkatarangarao forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

Quote:
           Very well explained, Alpaji Thanks Rangarao V V
Ph.D (Strl Engg, IITH)
SL STRUCTURAL CONSORTIUM
040 66669766


      --auto removed--
     



     




Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kotnoo
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 9:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Ich mÃchte mich fÃr deine großartige Arbeit herzlich bedanken. op3iYprYx21bKbASCO

On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:51 AM anitech <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Technical Brief; Preliminary Analysis of the Audit Office Building Collapse in Bangkok

Date: April 2025
Event: Collapse of 32-story Audit Office Building, Bangkok
Trigger: 7.7-magnitude Earthquake in Myanmar (March 28, 2025)
Status: Under Investigation 1. Background
On March 28, 2025, the 32-story Audit Office Building in Bangkok suffered a catastrophic collapse following seismic tremors from a magnitude 7.7 earthquake in Myanmar. Although the epicenter was over 500 km away, the seismic activity significantly affected Bangkok, exposing critical structural vulnerabilities. Initial observations and expert commentary provide insights into likely causes while a forensic investigation is ongoing. 2. Suspected Initiation Point
- Lower Column Failure: Failure likely began in longer columns on the lower floors, which are structurally more susceptible to buckling or shear under lateral load.
- Sudden Shear Failure: Eyewitness reports and video footage show rapid column shearing, suggesting brittle failure in vertical load-bearing members. 3. Likely Failure Mechanism
- Progressive Collapse: A cascading failure likely occurred after initial failure of critical components.
- Brittle Failure Mode: The sudden collapse without deformation indicates a brittle failure, potentially due to poor material quality or lack of seismic detailing. 4. Material and Design Concerns
a. Steel Quality Concerns
- Steel samples failed quality tests on mass, chemical composition, and tensile strength.
- Manufactured by a company with a record of safety violations.
- Substandard steel likely reduced the strength and ductility of concrete columns.
b. Structural System Vulnerabilities
- Flat Slab System: Lacks beams and is known to perform poorly in seismic zones.
- Construction Quality: Delays, worker shortages, and cost-cutting may have impacted structural integrity. 5. Role of Mechanical Couplers
- Couplers have not been confirmed as a contributing factor.
- Their role remains under review as part of the ongoing investigation. 6. Collapse of the Core Structure
- The core provided vertical and lateral support but relied on the surrounding structure.
- Once the lower columns failed, global stability was lost, leading to core collapse. 7. Summary of Key Findings (Preliminary)
Aspect
Findings
Failure Initiation
Likely in lower-floor columns due to longer span and weak material
Failure Type
Progressive and brittle collapse
Primary Suspect
Substandard steel—deficient in strength and composition
Design Concern
Flat slab system—vulnerable under seismic loading
Construction Issues
Alleged cost-cutting, worker shortage, and poor oversight
Core Collapse
Result of loss in global structural stability
Coupler Role
Not confirmed; under investigation
8. Recommendations for Further Review
- Conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis of material samples and structural debris.
- Implement a regulatory audit of steel supply chains and construction standard enforcement.
- Review seismic design of flat slab buildings in Bangkok and similar risk zones.
- Improve quality control, training, and site supervision for high-rise construction.9. Policy Recommendation:
Maintaining the highest quality standards is imperative at every stage of planning and executing large-scale structural or infrastructure projects. Achieving this requires the involvement of highly qualified experts and professionals throughout the design, construction, and supervision processes.
While post-incident investigations by leading experts are invaluable for diagnosing the causes of structural failures, they should not be the sole line of defense. Proactive policy reforms and administrative oversight must be institutionalized to strengthen quality assurance systems. We must insist and initiate wherever we find it absent.
Such measures are essential to prevent future failures and to ensure structural integrity and public safety from inception to completion.

Learning and learning appropriately from every event is very important for us, the active working professionals.
by:
Mahendra Barde, Mumbai-India .



Chartered Engineer & Consultant


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mahendra-barde/2/b86/9b1
Email: mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com) (mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com)), Cell: 91 98205 05145



Pl don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save Trees. Go Green.
Confidentiality Warning:This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Virus Warning:Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
Disclaimer:We are not a United States Securities Dealer, NFA/CFTC Member, or United States Investment Advisor.All articles and related documents are never considered to be asolicitationfor any purpose, in any form or content.Upon reading the articles and information you hereby acknowledge thiswarning and Disclaimer.All information provided is for informational purposes only, and shallnotbe relied upon as personal financial advice.
Thank you for your cooperation.









On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:03â€AM venkatarangarao forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

Quote:
           Very well explained, Alpaji Thanks Rangarao V V
Ph.D (Strl Engg, IITH)
SL STRUCTURAL CONSORTIUM
040 66669766


      --auto removed--
     



     





Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hemraj chanchal
SEFI Regulars
SEFI Regulars


Joined: 09 Jul 2018
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Dear Mahendra Barde,

Thank you for sharing this technical brief on the Audit Office Building collapsed in Bangkok. The preliminary analysis is informative and highlights several potential contributing factors.

While I appreciate the insights, I am concerned that the report seems to prematurely conclude regarding steel quality before the full forensic investigation is completed. I believe it's crucial to consider all aspects before drawing definitive conclusions.

I look forward to further updates as the investigation progresses.

Sincerely,
Hemraj ChanchalM.Tech (Structure)., B.Sc (Physics)., Post Graduate in HRD Management
Executive Director
HC Constructions & Consulting engineers



On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 17:57, anitech <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Technical Brief; Preliminary Analysis of the Audit Office Building Collapse in Bangkok

Date: April 2025
Event: Collapse of 32-story Audit Office Building, Bangkok
Trigger: 7.7-magnitude Earthquake in Myanmar (March 28, 2025)
Status: Under Investigation 1. Background
On March 28, 2025, the 32-story Audit Office Building in Bangkok suffered a catastrophic collapse following seismic tremors from a magnitude 7.7 earthquake in Myanmar. Although the epicenter was over 500 km away, the seismic activity significantly affected Bangkok, exposing critical structural vulnerabilities. Initial observations and expert commentary provide insights into likely causes while a forensic investigation is ongoing. 2. Suspected Initiation Point
- Lower Column Failure: Failure likely began in longer columns on the lower floors, which are structurally more susceptible to buckling or shear under lateral load.
- Sudden Shear Failure: Eyewitness reports and video footage show rapid column shearing, suggesting brittle failure in vertical load-bearing members. 3. Likely Failure Mechanism
- Progressive Collapse: A cascading failure likely occurred after initial failure of critical components.
- Brittle Failure Mode: The sudden collapse without deformation indicates a brittle failure, potentially due to poor material quality or lack of seismic detailing. 4. Material and Design Concerns
a. Steel Quality Concerns
- Steel samples failed quality tests on mass, chemical composition, and tensile strength.
- Manufactured by a company with a record of safety violations.
- Substandard steel likely reduced the strength and ductility of concrete columns.
b. Structural System Vulnerabilities
- Flat Slab System: Lacks beams and is known to perform poorly in seismic zones.
- Construction Quality: Delays, worker shortages, and cost-cutting may have impacted structural integrity. 5. Role of Mechanical Couplers
- Couplers have not been confirmed as a contributing factor.
- Their role remains under review as part of the ongoing investigation. 6. Collapse of the Core Structure
- The core provided vertical and lateral support but relied on the surrounding structure.
- Once the lower columns failed, global stability was lost, leading to core collapse. 7. Summary of Key Findings (Preliminary)
Aspect
Findings
Failure Initiation
Likely in lower-floor columns due to longer span and weak material
Failure Type
Progressive and brittle collapse
Primary Suspect
Substandard steel—deficient in strength and composition
Design Concern
Flat slab system—vulnerable under seismic loading
Construction Issues
Alleged cost-cutting, worker shortage, and poor oversight
Core Collapse
Result of loss in global structural stability
Coupler Role
Not confirmed; under investigation
8. Recommendations for Further Review
- Conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis of material samples and structural debris.
- Implement a regulatory audit of steel supply chains and construction standard enforcement.
- Review seismic design of flat slab buildings in Bangkok and similar risk zones.
- Improve quality control, training, and site supervision for high-rise construction.9. Policy Recommendation:
Maintaining the highest quality standards is imperative at every stage of planning and executing large-scale structural or infrastructure projects. Achieving this requires the involvement of highly qualified experts and professionals throughout the design, construction, and supervision processes.
While post-incident investigations by leading experts are invaluable for diagnosing the causes of structural failures, they should not be the sole line of defense. Proactive policy reforms and administrative oversight must be institutionalized to strengthen quality assurance systems. We must insist and initiate wherever we find it absent.
Such measures are essential to prevent future failures and to ensure structural integrity and public safety from inception to completion.

Learning and learning appropriately from every event is very important for us, the active working professionals.
by:
Mahendra Barde, Mumbai-India .



Chartered Engineer & Consultant


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mahendra-barde/2/b86/9b1
Email: mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com) (mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com)), Cell: 91 98205 05145



Pl don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save Trees. Go Green.
Confidentiality Warning:This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Virus Warning:Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
Disclaimer:We are not a United States Securities Dealer, NFA/CFTC Member, or United States Investment Advisor.All articles and related documents are never considered to be asolicitationfor any purpose, in any form or content.Upon reading the articles and information you hereby acknowledge thiswarning and Disclaimer.All information provided is for informational purposes only, and shallnotbe relied upon as personal financial advice.
Thank you for your cooperation.









On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:03â€AM venkatarangarao forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

Quote:
           Very well explained, Alpaji Thanks Rangarao V V
Ph.D (Strl Engg, IITH)
SL STRUCTURAL CONSORTIUM
040 66669766


      --auto removed--
     



     





Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anitech
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 06 May 2012
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2025 11:30 am    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Dear Hemraj Chanchal,
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback on the technical brief regarding the Audit Office Building collapse. I appreciate your recognition of the preliminary analysis and your concern about the conclusions drawn regarding steel quality.
You are correct that the early findings should not overshadow the importance of a comprehensive forensic investigation. It is crucial that we consider all relevant factors to avoid premature conclusions.
As mentioned, the report was based on information from news media sources. Until a site visit, design details, and a thorough forensic analysis are conducted, we cannot reach conclusive technical findings. My conclusions focus more on policy and governance aspects.
I will ensure that all updates are provided as the investigation continues, and I welcome any further insights you might have.
Best regards,

Mahendra Barde .

Chartered Engineer & Consultant


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mahendra-barde/2/b86/9b1
Email: mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com), Cell: 91 98205 05145



Pl don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save Trees. Go Green.
Confidentiality Warning:This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Virus Warning:Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
Disclaimer:We are not a United States Securities Dealer, NFA/CFTC Member, or United States Investment Advisor.All articles and related documents are never considered to be asolicitationfor any purpose, in any form or content.Upon reading the articles and information you hereby acknowledge thiswarning and Disclaimer.All information provided is for informational purposes only, and shallnotbe relied upon as personal financial advice.
Thank you for your cooperation.












On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:36 AM hemraj chanchal <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

[quote]            Dear Mahendra Barde,

Thank you for sharing this technical brief on the Audit Office Building collapsed in Bangkok. The preliminary analysis is informative and highlights several potential contributing factors.

While I appreciate the insights, I am concerned that the report seems to prematurely conclude regarding steel quality before the full forensic investigation is completed. I believe it's crucial to consider all aspects before drawing definitive conclusions.

I look forward to further updates as the investigation progresses.

Sincerely,
Hemraj ChanchalM.Tech (Structure)., B.Sc (Physics)., Post Graduate in HRD Management
Executive Director
HC Constructions & Consulting engineers



On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 17:57, anitech forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

      --auto removed--

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hemraj chanchal
SEFI Regulars
SEFI Regulars


Joined: 09 Jul 2018
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2025 12:30 pm    Post subject: Earthquake of March 28, 2025 Reply with quote

Dear Mahendra Barde,

Thank you for the clarification. I appreciate your commitment to a thorough investigation.

I understand that the initial report was based on preliminary information and that a comprehensive forensic analysis is necessary before reaching definitive conclusions. I look forward to receiving further updates as the investigation progresses and value your dedication to considering all relevant factors.

Thank you again for your time and consideration.

Best regards,
Hemraj ChanchalM.Tech (Structure), B.Sc (Physics), Post Graduate in HRD ManagementExecutive Director
HC Constructions & Consulting engineers



On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 20:24, anitech <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Dear Hemraj Chanchal,
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback on the technical brief regarding the Audit Office Building collapse. I appreciate your recognition of the preliminary analysis and your concern about the conclusions drawn regarding steel quality.
You are correct that the early findings should not overshadow the importance of a comprehensive forensic investigation. It is crucial that we consider all relevant factors to avoid premature conclusions.
As mentioned, the report was based on information from news media sources. Until a site visit, design details, and a thorough forensic analysis are conducted, we cannot reach conclusive technical findings. My conclusions focus more on policy and governance aspects.
I will ensure that all updates are provided as the investigation continues, and I welcome any further insights you might have.
Best regards,

Mahendra Barde .

Chartered Engineer & Consultant


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mahendra-barde/2/b86/9b1
Email: mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com) (mbarde@gmail.com (mbarde@gmail.com)), Cell: 91 98205 05145



Pl don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save Trees. Go Green.
Confidentiality Warning:This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Virus Warning:Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
Disclaimer:We are not a United States Securities Dealer, NFA/CFTC Member, or United States Investment Advisor.All articles and related documents are never considered to be asolicitationfor any purpose, in any form or content.Upon reading the articles and information you hereby acknowledge thiswarning and Disclaimer.All information provided is for informational purposes only, and shallnotbe relied upon as personal financial advice.
Thank you for your cooperation.












On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:36â€AM hemraj chanchal forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:

Quote:
           Dear Mahendra Barde,

Thank you for sharing this technical brief on the Audit Office Building collapsed in Bangkok. The preliminary analysis is informative and highlights several potential contributing factors.

While I appreciate the insights, I am concerned that the report seems to prematurely conclude regarding steel quality before the full forensic investigation is completed. I believe it's crucial to consider all aspects before drawing definitive conclusions.

I look forward to further updates as the investigation progresses.

Sincerely,
Hemraj ChanchalM.Tech (Structure)., B.Sc (Physics)., Post Graduate in HRD Management
Executive Director
HC Constructions & Consulting engineers



On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 17:57, anitech forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org) (forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)))> wrote:

      --auto removed--
     



     





Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topicReply to topic Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> SEFI General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA, Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. advertisement policy