www.sefindia.org

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

 Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptions DigestDigest Preferences   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister FAQSecurity Tips FAQDonate
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum 
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

Definition of building height

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> E-conference on IS 16700 13th March to 18th March 2018
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
r.shivshanker
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:31 am    Post subject: Definition of building height Reply with quote

Dear Moderators of the conference,

Thank you very much for organizing this conference, it is going to be very useful for all of us.

I have a simple question. I request you to provide further clarity on the definition of building height as per the code.

- Clause 3.1 needs to refer building height as H, to be consistent with Section 4 (Symbols).

- While the definition of the base of the building in clause 3.1 can be read subjectively, Section 4 clarifies that basements are not included if basement walls are connected with the ground floor slab

- The definition of the roof is not clear in clause 3.1. What is meant by ""..roof of the topmost level which is structurally integral and continuous with the floor below"?. Both the terms "integral" and "continuous" are incorrect, because floors at each level are separate. The term "continuous" is generally used in structural engineering terminology to refer to members that are connected at a certain point, for example continuous beam or slabs. Clearly floors at different levels cannot be continuous. The current definition can be applied to mean both a terrace slab of the same footprint as a typical floor slab or an LMR slab of much smaller footprint. Therefore, this clause needs further clarification.


The current definition of building height will likely be contentious for buildings close to the code limit of 250m, and can be read subjectively to make a building stay or exceed the code limit depending on who is the reader.

Regards,
Shiva
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
payal_12
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:41 am    Post subject: Definition of building height Reply with quote

Dear all


Please let me know where can u find the code for tall buildings. 


Thanks 


Payal 

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:12 PM r.shivshanker <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
           Dear Moderators of the conference,

Thank you very much for organizing this conference, it is going to be very useful for all of us.

I have a simple question. I request you to provide further clarity on the definition of building height as per the code.

- Clause 3.1 needs to refer building height as H, to be consistent with Section 4 (Symbols).

- While the definition of the base of the building in clause 3.1 can be read subjectively, Section 4 clarifies that basements are not included if basement walls are connected with the ground floor slab

- The definition of the roof is not clear in clause 3.1. What is meant by ""..roof of the topmost level which is structurally integral and continuous with the floor below"?. Both the terms "integral" and "continuous" are incorrect, because floors at each level are separate. The term "continuous" is generally used in structural engineering terminology to refer to members that are connected at a certain point, for example continuous beam or slabs. Clearly floors at different levels cannot be continuous. The current definition can be applied to mean both a terrace slab of the same footprint as a typical floor slab or an LMR slab of much smaller footprint. Therefore, this clause needs further clarification.


The current definition of building height will likely be contentious for buildings close to the code limit of 250m, and can be read subjectively to make a building stay or exceed the code limit depending on who is the reader.

Regards,
Shiva
     



     


Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> E-conference on IS 16700 13th March to 18th March 2018 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA, Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. advertisement policy